all in one place.
Log what you watch. Rate your favorites. See what friends are into.
Recommended Movies
Log what you watch. Rate your favorites. See what friends are into.
Director
Where to Watch
Log what you watch. Rate your favorites. See what friends are into.
In 2007, the United States Supreme Court decided Scott v. Harris, which held that where “the record blatantly contradicts the plaintiff’s version of events so that no reasonable jury could believe it, a court should not adopt that version of the facts for purposes of ruling on a summary judgment motion.” (BF)
June 25, 2011 · 15m
In 2007, the United States Supreme Court decided Scott v. Harris, which held that where “the record blatantly contradicts the plaintiff’s version of events so that no reasonable jury could believe it, a court should not adopt that version of the facts for purposes of ruling on a summary judgment motion.” (BF)